🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has announced it is pursuing compensation valued at $230 billion from the securities depository Euroclear. This legal step constitutes a clear response by the Kremlin regarding plans to use frozen Russian state funds to support Ukraine.

The Financial Lawsuit

Based on reports in Russian news outlets, the monetary authority initiated a claim last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This figure is equivalent to the aforementioned $230 billion demand.

EU leaders will decide later this week regarding a plan to leverage approximately €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. The proposal involves granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to fund its defence and financial stability.

The vast majority of these funds, totaling €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution acts as the main custodian for the Kremlin's immobilised financial reserves.

Divergent Legal Views

EU officials have argued that their proposal is on solid legal ground. Their position is based on the principle that title of the state assets still belongs to Russia, even though it was immobilized in European countries shortly after the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has labeled any use of the funds as illegal appropriation. Authorities have threatened retaliatory measures, including seizing EU corporate holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has assumed a key position in peace negotiations, wrote on X that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its assets. He added that the EU, the euro, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal.

Wider Implications

With statements interpreted as an effort to create division between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the proposal as "a severe attack on the right to ownership and the global financial system created by the United States."

The clearing house refused to provide a statement on the new legal action. The institution has in the past stated it is contending with over 100 legal cases in Russian courts.

Enforcement Challenges

Although judges in European nations are unlikely to recognize rulings from Russian tribunals, analysts expect Moscow to pursue enforcement in nations with closer ties to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities could try to enforce a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic states, provided that such holdings can be identified," stated a lawyer from an NSP law firm.

EU Countermeasures

EU officials said they are developing steps to discourage other countries from assisting any Russian legal action against European companies. They are also crafting protections to protect EU member states with investments in Russia from what they term "unlawful expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

Under the detailed plan, the EU would issue an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the cash earned from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's legal claim on the underlying funds would stay unaffected.

Kyiv would only be obligated to return the loan if and when Russia agreed to pay reparations for the immense destruction caused during the nearly four-year conflict.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to consider an different approach for funding Ukraine. This entails joint EU debt issuance to fund a loan, backed by unallocated funds within the EU budget.

This alternative move, nevertheless, demands full agreement among all 27 member states. The Hungarian government, viewed as friendly with the Kremlin, has previously expressed its objection.

Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, described the reparations loan as "the strongest solution" for supporting Ukraine. "The reparations loan is secured against the Russian frozen assets, which means it is not drawn from our public funds, which is also important," she remarked. "Furthermore, it delivers a clear message that if you cause all this damage to another country, you have to pay for the rebuilding."