🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive move to prohibit social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate internationally. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and guardians are monitoring closely to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for other nations.

Across Europe Movement

In Europe, a growing number of countries are considering parallel measures.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM declaring that smartphones and platforms are "stealing our children's innocence". The policy could be enacted next year.
• Norway is preparing to implement a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to protect children from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to confirm the identity and age of social media participants. The media minister have stated that an Australia-style ban could be "one of the tools on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has urged lawmakers to pass a bill increasing the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a related move, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has advised families to block their youngsters from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has adopted a advisory statement supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 except if guardian approval is provided. Although it highlights of the "compulsive" nature of these apps, the step does not create binding law.

"A strong age limit is a solid foundation," commented the European lawmaker behind the initiative.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Eye

In the UK, the administration has kept open a potential ban, arguing that "nothing is being dismissed" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in strong evidence".

Last year, momentum gathered behind a proposal to enact controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately modified. Instead, the government pledged to investigate the issue.

Campaign organizations have voiced apprehensions. One foundation established by the loved ones of a teenager who died after encountering dangerous social media material argues that a blanket age ban might not protect children and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when teens become eligible.

"This ban is a response to the failure of the tech sector to design tools that are safe and age appropriate for young users," commented a influential online safety campaigner.

America: A State-by-State Landscape

In the United States, legislation is primarily occurring at the regional level amid country-wide inaction.

• The state of Utah demands adult approval for under-18s to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a law prohibiting under-14s from joining social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a rule restricting minors to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with additional use needing parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed laws requiring parental consent for minors to set up social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and proposals from certain politicians to copy the Australian example, a nationwide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

International Views

Outside of these regions, other states are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, global agencies strike a more measured tone. Unicef has warned that social media bans have downsides and "may even backfire". The agency notes that the internet can be a "critical link" for vulnerable young people and that bans should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to prioritize child safeguards.

Even as this international discussion unfolds, the steps of the Australian government and several other countries indicate that policymakers globally are increasingly prepared to wait for tech companies to make changes on their own.